Leitfaden für grenzüberschreitende Forschungspartnerschaften
11 Prinzipien & 7 Fragen
Grenzüberschreitende und interkulturelle Forschungspartnerschaften bedingen neben der Erarbeitung fundierten Wissens auch einen ständigen Prozess gegenseitigen Lernens und Aufbauens von gegenseitigem Vertrauen und gemeinsamer Verantwortung.
Die 11 Prinzipien der KFPE unterstreichen diesen Prozess. Allerdings gibt es viele Arten von Forschungspartnerschaften, mit unterschiedlichen Anforderungen an Interaktion, Kommunikation und Gegenseitigkeit. Das gilt insbesondere für Kooperationen zwischen reichen und armen Ländern. Die einzelnen Prinzipien müssen also je nach Art der Partnerschaft selektiv angewendet und unterschiedlich gewichtet werden.
Die 7 zentralen Fragen zu grenzüberschreitenden Forschungspartnerschaften zeigen auf, welche Faktoren Partnerschaften in unterschiedlichen Kontexten behindern oder fördern. Damit sollen sie die Leserinnen und Leser darin unterstützen, die Art und Beschaffenheit von konkreten Partnerschaften besser zu verstehen.
Seitenangabe: 30
Dazu gehört
This publication analyses opportunities and risks of transdisciplinary research partnerships with business and civil society in the North-South context. Such partnerships are in many cases crucial for impactful research and need to be implemented cautious and strategic. Well implemented partnerships enhance the practical relevance of research and the uptake of results, they provide access to additional data and networks but they also entail the risk of undermining scientific rigour and independence, and they increase the complexity of a research project and power-imbalances. This analysis provides some practical information and orientation for researchers and funding institutions in Switzerland on these opportunities and risks. The publication is the result of a literature review and a stakeholder dialogue with researchers and research-funders.
In public health, evidence generated by research can form the basis of effective new laws, regulations and standards. For a variety of reasons, research evidence is often unable to reach policy-makers, regulators and practitioners. Findings from in-depth interviews with researchers from five public health projects in low- and middle-income countries provide insights into different strategies that facilitate collaboration and communication between stakeholders, including policy-makers and practitioners.
EADI Blog by Katarzyna Cieslik, Shreya Sinha, Cees Leeuwis, Tania Eulalia Martínez-Cruz, Nivedita Narain and Bhaskar Vira
This paper sets out a rationale for a new ambition of collaboration, based upon the need for new levels of investment in Africa’s research capacity. As the African Union and the European Union are developing a new strategy for jointly addressing our global challenges, they have a unique opportunity to invest in African research universities, and support new collaborative networks of universities and researchers in both continents. This is key to the ability of both continents to address our societal challenges like climate change and digital transformation. Both, the European Union and the African Union, have emphasized the importance of supporting research and innovation, and the universities within which these take place. This is a crucial time to act, to ensure that collaboration between Africa and Europe is future-oriented and strategic, and carries the support of universities, governments, and the two Unions.
EADI BLOG by Linda Johnson and Rodrigo Mena
Bild: Charl Folscher on Unsplash
Co-creation of research knowledge between academics and non-academic stakeholders, contributes to sustainable development and societal transformation. Based on a survey conducted among 43 international research partnership projects, this policy brief recommend an active engagement with non-academic actors, especially from vulnerable groups and local enterprises, from the start of a research endeavour.
Downloads/Links
Sponsoren | |
|---|---|
 | |